Wildlife livestream cameras have become a booming genre of online nature content, with some feeds accumulating millions of viewers globally. NestCam-style setups — small cameras inside bird boxes, connected to home laptops and streamed live — have turned suburban gardens into broadcast studios. The following is Cecil Blackwing's response.
The camera went up in February. I watched them do it. Two screws into the fence post, a little roof like a tiny house, a hole the diameter of a blue tit. Then the wire. Down the fence, along the wall, through a gap they'd drilled in the kitchen window frame. Inside, a laptop. On the laptop, a livestream.
They called it NestCam.
The blue tits moved in by March. Four eggs. The internet lost its mind.
I know about the internet because I know about screens. I know about screens because I have watched humans look at them for twenty years from this oak, and what I have noticed is this: the screen makes the thing more real to them. Not less. More. The blue tits in the box three metres from their kitchen window were, apparently, not quite real until they appeared on the laptop. Then they were fascinating. Then they were beloved. Then they had four million views and a dedicated Reddit thread and a woman in Ohio who set an alarm for 6am to check if the eggs had hatched.
The eggs hatched. The woman in Ohio cried. I am not making this up.
Meanwhile, outside the kitchen window, in the actual physical garden that the NestCam family owns, the following things occurred without being filmed or viewed or wept over in Ohio: a song thrush built a nest in the hawthorn and raised three young. A hedgehog used the gap under the gate for eleven consecutive nights. Two bats took moths off the buddleia every evening from dusk to full dark. A slow worm lived under the third paving slab for the entire summer and presumably still does.
Nobody knows about any of this. There is no dedicated Reddit thread. The slow worm has zero views.
There is a thing that happens when you watch nature through a screen. You watch it the way you watch television — waiting for things to happen, for drama, for the moment.
I want to be careful here. I'm not saying the people are bad. The people are fine. The people put up a bird box and drilled a hole in their window frame and that is more than most people do, and the blue tits had a good season, and four million people now know what a clutch looks like from underneath, which is four million people who didn't know before, and maybe that matters.
But.
There is a thing that happens when you watch nature through a screen. You watch it the way you watch television — waiting for things to happen, for drama, for the moment. The NestCam family was on the garden camera when the sparrowhawk took one of the fledglings in July. There were complaints.
Someone said the algorithm should have cut away. Someone said the channel had a responsibility to its audience. The sparrowhawk, for its part, ate the fledgling on a fence post and then cleaned its talons on the wire of the camera housing and then left.
The sparrowhawk did not know it was on camera. This is the only sane relationship you can have with a sparrowhawk.
I have lived in this street for eleven years. I have watched three full generations of the family in the corner house, which is the NestCam family. I watched the grandmother die and the children grow and a marriage end badly in a kitchen argument that went on for forty minutes and was considerably more dramatic than anything the blue tits produced all season. I watched them put up a trampoline and then not use it. I have seen things.
What I have not done is mediate any of it through a screen. This is, I think, the difference between watching and really looking.
The blue tits fledged in June. Four of them made it. The internet was jubilant. Someone made a compilation. The NestCam family cleaned out the box in September, found the empty shells, posted a photo with the caption until next year. Forty thousand likes. A woman in Ohio said it was the best thing she had followed all year. Better than the news.
I don't disagree with the woman in Ohio about the news.
But the slow worm is still there. Under the third paving slab. Doing whatever slow worms do in September, which is moving slowly and eating things and being part of the garden in the way that everything in the garden is part of the garden — without storyline, without arc, without four million people waiting to see what happens next.
It doesn't need an audience. It needs the paving slab. It needs the damp underneath. It needs the gap under the gate to stay open and the chemicals off the lawn and the particular darkness that comes from being left alone by a species that has, for the moment, its attention elsewhere.
The camera blinks its little red light through the winter. Waiting. Ready.
Outside, eleven years of the street continues without documentation. A fox I have watched since she was a cub crosses the garden at 2am. Fieldmice winter under the compost heap. A tawny owl I know only by voice calls from the cemetery elms.
Four million views. Zero for the rest of it.
Make of that what you will. I've got a fence post to get back to.
Cecil has been observing humans for eleven years from rooftops, rubbish bins, and the occasional courtroom skylight. He files short, punishing analyses of human decision-making with the confidence of a species that has been outsmarting traps since before your parliament existed. He covers politics, policy, and civic incompetence. He finds all of it funny, briefly, and then finds it catastrophic.
All dispatches from Cecil Blackwing →